Library Articles
Cal. Ap. Bars Attorney fees To Prevailing Party Who Refuses To First Mediate
Paul R. Fisher
Judith Stalk, Editor
Frei v. Davey, Court of Appeal of Calif, Fourth App. Dist, Div Three;
124 Cal. App. 4th 1506; 22 Cal. Rptr. 3d 429.
The standard form residential purchase agreement used in
California has a recently added clause providing that a prevailing
party in litigation or arbitration who refused (emphasis by the court)
a request to mediate made before the commencement of such proceedings
is barred from recovering attorney fees. This is the first published
case in which this provision has been applied. "The new provision
barring recovery of attorney fees by a prevailing party who refuses
a request for mediation means what it says and will be enforced."
The court of appeals found that the Davies were the
prevailing party on appeal, but that "Any award of attorney fees to
the Davies was contingent on their compliance with the mediation
provision found in paragraph 17A of the [standard form purchase and
sale of residential real property] agreement... If the Davies
refused the Freis' request for mediation, the Davies may not recover
their attorney fees, despite the fact they were the prevailing parties
in the litigation."
The Court lamented "It is also a graphic illustration
of a case that should have been mediated at an early stage when the
parties were only $18,540 plus expenses apart in their settlement
positions. Hundreds of thousands of dollars in attorney fees have
been spent and the parties have litigated through two trials and
three appeals. The lesson? There is a good reason the mediation
clause was in the Agreement and the legal consequences specified by
the Agreement for refusing to mediate will be enforced." No party
recovered any damages, and the sale of the house was not compelled.
|